Fair Use Disclaimer FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific,social significance and make every effort to include appropriate credit, hyperlinks, and author/publication information. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|
I would like to welcome everyone to We Hate Gringos. I am working on trying to make this one of the best sites on the web for a broad swath of information on illegal immigration, multiculturalism, sovereignty and the national/regional political scene. I am not one of those who believes in political correctness or political parties. I try to keep the site updated as often as possible. I am always open to volunteers/ contributors. Those of you I know from other sites glad to see you here. As always civility is expected.
You must be registered to comment. Those who were registered on the old site will need to re-register. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Thanks Brad
Brad
WHG
Well as I expected there is much ado about the proposed national ID card as part of the Schumer/Graham amnesty. Now, I like most Americans do not like the Feds/ state or any other agency or business having info on me or for that info to become available to other interests. But as we examine today’s society, how much privacy do we really enjoy? Our financial information is collected and reported to at least 3 big clearing houses. We have to submit records to have a child, to drive, to enroll our children into school,to get a visa or passport and for most of us to apply for a job. If we need government social service help, we are finger printed, our income and household members names and SS numbers are required. Proof of residence is required to get a mailbox at the USPS. If you purchase real estate, life insurance or use a medical facility you information becomes part of a data base.
The idea of a national ID card is repulsive. But I believe we are already there. It is call a SS card. As for personal information, a quick search with Google shows that there are numerous ways for people to obtain information about you legally. Information is in the public record and various other collection data bases.
So what about the idea of a national ID card? I don’t believe a new card is necessary. What I believe is that SS cards should be made at least as secure as credit cards or driver’s licenses. Of course those opposing anything that would be effective against identity thief, fraud or illegal workers will say the cards could be forged. Well that is indeed possible, but it doesn’t stop credit card companies from doing billions of dollars of business using semi secure cards. It doesn’t stop states from licensing people to drive in their state, or allowing those licenses to be used for identification.
SS cards should be made more secure. A picture and thumb print along with a magnetic strip with encrypted number would go along way to prevent fraud, identity theft and illegals in the work place. If the government is not going to make the cards secure and protect identities, then those cards/SS numbers should not be used as an identifier for the IRS, credit and other functions or services.
On the use of a card as a provision of CIR, it is a scam. A national ID card would be challenged by various groups on privacy and right to work statutes. The security provision that the cards would provide would be watered down or nullified by lawsuits. The end result would be an amnesty without any enforcement. If SS cards were enhanced with better security, amnesty or CIR would not be needed. Such a card would be a big deterrent and a serious boost to the process of attrition. Without fraudulent identification, illegal aliens would self deport.
Be sure to vote in the new poll
![]() Chris Chmielenski
Numbers USA
Next weekend, 100,000 pro-amnesty supporters are expected to flood the nation’s capital to show their support for a mass amnesty. NumbersUSA mobilization has stopped every amnesty since 2000, and we’re revving up our resources to do the same this time around.
On Friday, we’ll begin our S.T.O.P. Amnesty in 4 Days campaign, but we’ll need your help to get the job done.
FRIDAY (3/19) — Day 1 is our local nationwide effort. We need you to visit your Member’s local Congressional offices at 1:30 p.m. EDT with a signed letter. If you can make a visit or have any questions, please email Jenny Magyari (JMagyari@NumbersUSA.com) with your name and please, please be sure to include your Congressional district.
SATURDAY (3/20) — Day 2, we’ll launch our faxing and petition campaign. Check your Action Board first thing next Saturday for new faxes to your Members of Congress. When the Members return to their Washington offices, we need them to see your HUGE RESPONSE. It’s also our Social Networking Day, so join us on Facebook and Twitter by clicking on the links to the right.
SUNDAY (3/21) – Day 3, the pro-amnesty organizers will host their rally on the National Mall in Washington D.C., and we’ll be there. We’ll provide a webcast of the day’s events on our homepage. Look for video leading to the event on our website early next week.
MONDAY (3/22) – Day 4, it’s our National Call Campaign, so check your Action Board for new phone notes with talking points. The pro-amnesty supporters will be walking the halls of Congress urging Members to pass an amnesty. So It’s very important to make these phone calls and have the office phones ringing during their visit. We’ll also provide coverage on our website of an immigration panel that Roy will take part in, educating Congressional staffers.
Our message will be simple. Congress should focus on putting 25 million Americans back to full-time work, not offering an amnesty to 12 million illegal aliens, most of whom are in the U.S. workforce. Make sure they hear our message – stay tuned throughout the upcoming week to see what you can do!
Update Friday March 19
NumbersUSA is reporting over 7000 people visiting congressional offices today in protest against illegal alien amnesty!
HASANI GITTENS
NBC New York
Gov. David Paterson today courted some more controversy for himself as he took a relatively hard line on illegal immigrants during illegal a morning radio show.
A caller on “The John Gambling Show” on WOR-radio asked Paterson about the cost burden illegal aliens put on the education system that is shouldered by legal resident tax-payers.
“There’s a difference between illegal aliens and illegal permanent residents. Illegal aliens obviously shouldn’t be here,” he told the caller. “and the only time that we aren’t as aggressive in trying to find illegal aliens is when it’s a health care issue.”
“If you know any illegal aliens that are here that shouldn’t be here, then the important thing is to report it to the INS and lets get moving so that we reduce that number,” said the governor. Continue reading Paterson on Illegal Immigrants: Round ‘Em Up
Donald A. Collins
VDARE
This Sunday, March 21, 2010, the Treason Lobby is staging a march in Washington, DC. One hundred thousand protestors are reportedly being bused there to demand amnesty for the 12-plus million illegal aliens in the US now taking jobs from Americans and sopping up tax-supported services.
Many in the patriotic immigration reform movement, for example VDARE.com’s Joe Guzzardi, have opined that “comprehensive immigration reform” a.k.a. amnesty will not be on the agenda this year. How can it be, when millions of Americans are unemployed, or underemployed?
And when I first heard about this proposed march, my reaction was “Great! When Americans see their arrogance and selfish disdain for our unemployment crisis, they will be outraged and let their Congress know their feelings.”
I still think I am correct about American citizen anger. But I have just heard from a California friend who has a strongly different opinion. Continue reading Will Sunday’s Amnesty March Backfire?
Robert Moon
The Examiner
Imagine illegally breaking in to someone else’s country, marching down their streets with your country’s flags and demanding that they speak your language, educate your children and cut you welfare checks…all while branding anyone who dares to object as a bigot or xenophobe.
This is the “fairness” and “equality” illegal immigrants will be openly demanding in our streets on Sunday…as our already teetering, bankrupt economy struggles to avoid Depression-era unemployment levels.
As with everything liberals do, this is about nothing more than Democrat power–specifically, importing 15 million new Democrat voters. And no, further bankrupting our schools, over-crowding our prisons, bottoming out our wages and compromising national defense is not worth it just to get cheaper lettuce.
As I have noted, Democrats and liberal RINOs are planning to follow up this month’s illegal government takeover with yet another outrageous betrayal of the American people–amnesty for illegal immigrants. As I have also noted, the overwhelming majority of voters are dead-set against such attacks on the rule of law.
Rasmussen Reports
The Obama administration announced on Tuesday that it is halting funding of the fence along the U.S.-Mexico border, but 59% of Americans believe the United States should continue to build that fence.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 26% of adults disagree and think the building of the fence should be stopped. Fifteen percent (15%) more are not sure.
Support for the fence has been at this level for several years. In January of last year, 60% favored the continued building of the fence to help stop illegal immigration and drug trafficking. In August 2007, 56% felt that way.
Following this week’s shooting deaths of U.S. consulate personnel in Mexico, 49% say they are more concerned about drug violence along the border than illegal immigration. Thirty-nine percent (39%) remain more concerned about illegal immigration. This is consistent with findings in January 2009 amid news reports of escalating drug violence in Mexico. Continue reading 59% Say U.S. Should Continue To Build Fence on U.S.-Mexico Border
Investor’s Business Daily
Illegal Immigration: The government puts the brakes on a problem-plagued “virtual” fence on our border with Mexico. Whatever happened to the old-fashioned kind? If ever there was a shovel-ready project, this is it.
The much-ballyhooed “virtual” fence that was supposed to monitor and control illegal immigration doesn’t work and is being scrapped as we evaluate alternatives and rely on existing technology.
After years of delay and billions of dollars already spent, Secretary Napolitano on Tuesday halted work on SBInet. The system involves cameras, sensors and radars designed to let a small number of dispatchers watch the border on computer monitors and dispatch Border Patrol agents when and where they were needed.
At least that was the theory. “Effective immediately, the Department of Homeland Security will redeploy $50 million of Recovery Act funding originally allocated for the SBInet … to other tested, commercially available security technology along the Southwest border,” she said. Continue reading De-Fence, De-Fence
Michelle Malkin
VDARE
If you cannot trust government’s numbers, you cannot trust government’s words. This is the lesson of the House Democrats’ desperate promotion of a phony-baloney Congressional Budget Office analysis of their latest health care takeover package.
Democratic leaders leaked a solid-seeming price tag—$940 billion over 10 years—before the CBO released any official comment or report. Liberal blogs and mainstream newswires started parroting Democrats’ claims that their plan “would cut the deficit by $130 billion over the next decade, and $1.2 trillion in the second decade of the plan’s implementation”—again, before the CBO had released an iota of information, and hours before the House Rules Committee posted the long-awaited reconciliation bill.
House Majority Whip James Clyburn pronounced himself “giddy” over the supposed CBO scoring. Math lover and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi proclaimed: “I love numbers. They’re so precise.”
But “precise” does not mean “accurate.” And the most “precise” numbers can be utterly worthless. That is basically what CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf pointed out in his summary of the unofficial preliminary analysis of Demcare:
“Although CBO completed a preliminary review of legislative language prior to its release, the agency has not thoroughly examined the reconciliation proposal to verify its consistency with the previous draft. This estimate is therefore preliminary, pending a review of the language of the reconciliation proposal, as well as further review and refinement of the budgetary projections.”
Translation: Garbage in, garbage out. Elmendorf’s weary number crunchers know they are just more stage props in the Oba-Kabuki health care theater. Like the president’s partisan donor-doctors dressed up in their White House-supplied lab coats, the CBO’s statistical authorities are being exploited to lend credibility and solidity to the Democrats’ legislative vaporware. Continue reading The Deem-o-crats’ Towering Deception
I believe the feds are using the demographics to sort out which ethnic groups/races to pander to the most. We have constantly heard that Hispanics are the largest and fastest growing ethnic group. How did the government determine this? Because people without thinking answered the un-constitution questions.
Be sure to check out the article on body scanners, read the article and the comments.
Chuck Baldwin
NewsWithViews.com
The constitutional requirement for the Census is found in Article. I. Section. 2. Paragraph. 3. “The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.”
The purpose of the Census is that of counting the US population in order to apportion among the states the number of representatives in the US House of Representatives. That’s it. Nothing more. Nothing less.
There is nothing in the Constitution requiring or even suggesting questions regarding race, ethnicity, whether one owns or rents his or her home, income status, disability status, education, or anything of the sort. The only purpose of the Census is to count the US population. Anything beyond that is nothing more than an intrusive government prying and snooping into our lives: something the federal government is doing with greater and greater frequency and intensity these days. Continue reading CENSUS IS FOR COUNTING NOT PRYING
Chuck Baldwin
VDARE
Anyone paying attention knows that John McCain has been a Big-Government Globalist Neocon (BGGN) for virtually his entire senatorial career. As with many BGGNs hiding out in the Republican Party, McCain likes to talk about smaller government, but his track record is littered with the promotion of one big government program after another. But, what else would one expect from a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)?
Lately, however, McCain has outdone himself. He has introduced two bills in the US Senate that are about as Machiavellian as they could be. I am referring to S.3081, a bill that would authorize the federal government to detain American citizens indefinitely without trial, and S.3002, a bill that would authorize the federal government to regulate vitamins, minerals, and virtually all health and natural food products.
According to Examiner.com, “Last week, John McCain introduced a bill into the U.S. Senate which, if passed, would actually allow U.S. citizens to be arrested and detained indefinitely, all without Miranda rights or ever being charged with a crime.” Continue reading John McCain’s Attack On Liberty
Anna Gorman
LA Times
Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) have laid out the framework for a comprehensive, bipartisan immigration reform bill that would include tougher border enforcement, creation of biometric Social Security cards and a path to legalization for the nation’s estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants.
The announcement of the plan, which brought immediate praise from President Obama, comes days before a pro-immigration march scheduled for the nation’s capital on Sunday. Continue reading Bipartisan immigration reform framework announced
MANU RAJU
PoliticoRepublicans are threatening to make life difficult for Democrats if they try to push health care reform through the Senate using the budget reconciliation process.
The response from Democrats: What else is new?
Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) told POLITICO on Monday that it will be “much, much harder” to reach bipartisan consensus on anything if Democrats push ahead with reconciliation.
Financial regulatory reform “could easily fall victim,” Kyl said.
“I don’t think immigration reform was realistic, but this certainly doesn’t enhance its prospects at all,” he added. “And even something like climate change legislation and, I’m sure, any of the tax legislation we’ll have to deal with later — all of these things will be impacted by the mood of the Senate, and it’s not going to be good if this reconciliation process is used.”
But Democrats said Republicans have shown little interest in cooperating with their legislative agenda anyway. And as if to underscore the point, they threatened Monday to force the Senate into an all-night session to win passage of a modest jobs bill that has already cleared a cloture vote before striking an agreement on the timing. Continue reading ‘It could be war’
|
|
Loading ...
Recent Comments